含油污泥的催化水热转化研究

作者

  • 张洁 交通新能源开发、应用与汽车节能陕西省重点实验室,长安大学,西安市710064,陕西省,中国
  • 张玲玲 西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室,西安理工大学,西安市710048,陕西省,中国
  • 李虎林 西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室,西安理工大学,西安市710048,陕西省,中国
  • 田欣悦 西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室,西安理工大学,西安市710048,陕西省,中国
  • 黄荣普 西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室,西安理工大学,西安市710048,陕西省,中国
  • 卢金玲 西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室,西安理工大学,西安市710048,陕西省,中国
Article ID: 149
49 Views

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18686/cncest.v2i1.149

摘要

含油污泥是石油勘探行业常见的副产品,资源丰富,毒性较强。在世界上许多国家,它被归类为危险废物。由于亚/超临界水独特的物理化学特性,以亚/超临界水为介质的水热转化技术在资源化利用和含油污泥的安全处置方面的应用日益广泛。本文综述了油泥无氧水热转化的研究进展,包括水热碳化、水热液化、水热提质、超临界水气化等。由于污泥中的含氮和含硫化合物对水热转化产物的显著影响,讨论了这两种化合物的加氢转化、反应路径和动力学。最后,对水热过程中载体和催化剂的研究进行了总结和比较。该综述可以为未来的研究提供建议,并为含油污泥的水热催化处理提供指导。

参考

1. Hochberg SY, Tansel B, Laha S. Materials and energy recovery from oily sludges removed from crude oil storage tanks (tank bottoms): A review of technologies. Journal of Environmental Management. 2022, 305: 114428. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114428

2. Li J, Lin F, Li K, et al. A critical review on energy recovery and non-hazardous disposal of oily sludge from petroleum industry by pyrolysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2021, 406: 124706. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124706

3. Wang Y, Fan D, Li W. Analysis and prospect of domestic and foreign oil and gas resources in 2020. China Mining Magazine. 2021, 30(1): 18-23. doi:10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2021.01.035

4. Duan H, Huang Q, Wang Q, et al. Hazardous waste generation and management in China: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2008, 158(2-3): 221-227. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.106

5. Hu G, Li J, Zeng G. Recent development in the treatment of oily sludge from petroleum industry: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2013, 261: 470-490. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.069

6. Robertson SJ, McGill WB, Massicotte HB, et al. Petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in boreal forest soils: a mycorrhizal ecosystems perspective. Biological Reviews. 2007, 82(2): 213-240. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.2007.00012.x

7. Naz A, Chowdhury A, Chandra R, et al. Potential human health hazard due to bioavailable heavy metal exposure via consumption of plants with ethnobotanical usage at the largest chromite mine of India. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 2020, 42(12): 4213-4231. doi: 10.1007/s10653-020-00603-5

8. Wake H. Oil refineries: a review of their ecological impacts on the aquatic environment. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2005, 62(1-2): 131-140. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2004.08.013

9. Teng Q, Zhang D, Yang C. A review of the application of different treatment processes for oily sludge. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020, 28(1): 121-132. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11176-2

10. Ubani O, Atagana H I, Thantsha MS. Biological degradation of oil sludge: A review of the current state of development. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2013, 12(47): 6544-6567. doi: 10.5897/AJB11.1139

11. Qu Y, Li A, Wang D, et al. Kinetic study of the effect of in-situ mineral solids on pyrolysis process of oil sludge. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2019, 374: 338-346. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.183

12. Gao N, Kamran K, Quan C, et al. Thermochemical conversion of sewage sludge: A critical review. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2020, 79: 100843. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100843

13. Zhao Y, Yan X, Zhou J, et al. Treatment of oily sludge by two-stage wet air oxidation. Journal of the Energy Institute. 2019, 92(5): 1451-1457. doi: 10.1016/j.joei.2018.08.006

14. Al-Doury MMI. Treatment of oily sludge using solvent extraction. Petroleum Science and Technology. 2019, 37(2): 190-196. doi: 10.1080/10916466.2018.1533859

15. Gao N, Duan Y, Li Z, et al. Hydrothermal treatment combined with in-situ mechanical compression for floated oily sludge dewatering. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2021, 402: 124173. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124173

16. Wei N, Xu D, Hao B, et al. Chemical reactions of organic compounds in supercritical water gasification and oxidation. Water Research. 2021, 190: 116634. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116634

17. Duan P, Zhang C, Wang F, et al. Activated carbons for the hydrothermal upgrading of crude duckweed bio-oil. Catalysis Today. 2016, 274: 73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.01.046

18. Liu X, Yang M, Deng Z, et al. Hydrothermal hydrodeoxygenation of palmitic acid over Pt/C catalyst: Mechanism and kinetic modeling. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2021, 407: 126332. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126332

19. Fomo G, Madzimbamuto TN, Ojumu TV. Applications of Nonconventional Green Extraction Technologies in Process Industries: Challenges, Limitations and Perspectives. Sustainability. 2020, 12(13): 5244. doi: 10.3390/su12135244

20. Khan MK, Cahyadi HS, Kim SM, et al. Efficient oil recovery from highly stable toxic oily sludge using supercritical water. Fuel. 2019, 235: 460-472. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.003

21. Huang J, Wang Z, Qiao Y, et al. Transformation of nitrogen during hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge: Effects of temperature and Na/Ca acetates addition. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 2021, 38(3): 4335-4344. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.075

22. Wang T, Zhai Y, Zhu Y, et al. A review of the hydrothermal carbonization of biomass waste for hydrochar formation: Process conditions, fundamentals, and physicochemical properties. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018, 90: 223-247. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.071

23. Demir M, Ashourirad B, Mugumya JH, et al. Nitrogen and oxygen dual-doped porous carbons prepared from pea protein as electrode materials for high performance supercapacitors. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2018, 43(40): 18549-18558. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.03.220

24. Leng L, Yang L, Chen J, et al. A review on pyrolysis of protein-rich biomass: Nitrogen transformation. Bioresource Technology. 2020, 315: 123801. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123801

25. Pauline AL, Joseph K. Hydrothermal carbonization of oily sludge for solid fuel recovery – Investigation of chemical characteristics and combustion behaviour. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 2021, 157: 105235. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105235

26. Ekpo U, Ross AB, Camargo-Valero MA, et al. A comparison of product yields and inorganic content in process streams following thermal hydrolysis and hydrothermal processing of microalgae, manure and digestate. Bioresource Technology. 2016, 200: 951-960. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.018

27. Fang J, Tang Q, Li Y, et al. Morphology of phosphorus and metal extraction behavior in sewage sludge during hydrothermal carbonization treatment. CIESC Journal. 2020, 71: 3288-3295. doi: 10.11949/0438-1157.20200042

28. Valdez PJ, Tocco VJ, Savage PE. A general kinetic model for the hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae. Bioresource Technology. 2014, 163: 123-127. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.013

29. Lachos-Perez D, César Torres-Mayanga P, Abaide ER, et al. Hydrothermal carbonization and liquefaction: Differences, progress, challenges, and opportunities. Bioresource Technology. 2022, 343: 126084. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126084

30. Nazem MA, Tavakoli O. Bio-oil production from refinery oily sludge using hydrothermal liquefaction technology. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2017, 127: 33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2017.03.020

31. Islam MN, Jung SK, Jung HY, et al. The feasibility of recovering oil from contaminated soil at petroleum oil spill site using a subcritical water extraction technology. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2017, 111: 52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2017.06.015

32. Zhang J, Zhang Y. Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Microalgae in an Ethanol–Water Co-Solvent To Produce Biocrude Oil. Energy & Fuels. 2014, 28(8): 5178-5183. doi: 10.1021/ef501040j

33. Jena U, Das KC, Kastner JR. Effect of operating conditions of thermochemical liquefaction on biocrude production from Spirulina platensis. Bioresource Technology. 2011, 102(10): 6221-6229. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.057

34. Al-Muntaser AA, Varfolomeev MA, Suwaid MA, et al. Hydrothermal upgrading of heavy oil in the presence of water at sub-critical, near-critical and supercritical conditions. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2020, 184: 106592. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106592

35. Güngören T, Saǧlam M, Yüksel M, et al. Near-Critical and Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Industrial Sewage Sludge. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2007, 46(4): 1051-1057. doi: 10.1021/ie0614780

36. Khan MK, Cahyadi HS, Kim SM, et al. Efficient oil recovery from highly stable toxic oily sludge using supercritical water. Fuel. 2019, 235: 460-472. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.003

37. Radfarnia HR, Khulbe C, Little EC. Supercritical water treatment of oil sludge, a viable route to valorize waste oil materials. Fuel. 2015, 159: 653-658. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.06.094

38. Yeletsky PM, Zaikina OO, Sosnin GA, et al. Heavy oil cracking in the presence of steam and nanodispersed catalysts based on different metals. Fuel Processing Technology. 2020, 199: 106239. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106239

39. Jocz JN, Thompson LT, Savage PE. Catalyst Oxidation and Dissolution in Supercritical Water. Chemistry of Materials. 2018, 30(4): 1218-1229. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03713

40. Abdpour S, Santos RM. Recent advances in heterogeneous catalysis for supercritical water oxidation/gasification processes: Insight into catalyst development. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2021, 149: 169-184. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.10.047

41. Peng P, Guo S, Li L, et al. Supercritical water gasification mechanism of polymer-containing oily sludge. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2021, 46(53): 26834-26847. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.05.161

42. Wang C, Wu C, Zhang H, et al. Hydrothermal treatment of petrochemical sludge in subcritical and supercritical water: Oil phase degradation and syngas production. Chemosphere. 2021, 278: 130392. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130392

43. Zhang J, Dasgupta A, Chen Z, et al. Supercritical water gasification of phenol over Ni-Ru bimetallic catalysts. Water Research. 2019, 152: 12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.12.030

44. Yuan PQ, Cheng ZM, Zhang XY, et al. Catalytic denitrogenation of hydrocarbons through partial oxidation in supercritical water. Fuel. 2006, 85(3): 367-373. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.07.006

45. Patwardhan PR, Timko MT, Class CA, et al. Supercritical Water Desulfurization of Organic Sulfides Is Consistent with Free-Radical Kinetics. Energy & Fuels. 2013, 27(10): 6108-6117. doi: 10.1021/ef401150w

46. Kriipsalu M, Marques M, Maastik A. Characterization of oily sludge from a wastewater treatment plant flocculation-flotation unit in a petroleum refinery and its treatment implications. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management. 2008, 10(1): 79-86. doi: 10.1007/s10163-007-0188-7

47. Ramaswamy B, Kar DD, De S. A study on recovery of oil from sludge containing oil using froth flotation. Journal of Environmental Management. 2007, 85(1): 150-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.08.009

48. Liu W, Luo Y, Teng Y, et al. Bioremediation of oily sludge-contaminated soil by stimulating indigenous microbes. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 2009, 32(1): 23-29. doi: 10.1007/s10653-009-9262-5

49. Biswal BK, Tiwari SN, Mukherji S. Biodegradation of oil in oily sludges from steel mills. Bioresource Technology. 2009, 100(4): 1700-1703. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.037

50. Van Hamme JD, Odumeru JA, Ward OP. Community dynamics of a mixed-bacterial culture growing on petroleum hydrocarbons in batch culture. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 2000, 46(5): 441-450. doi: 10.1139/w00-013

51. Shi Q, Zhao S, Zhou Y, et al. Development of heavy oil upgrading technologies in China. Reviews in Chemical Engineering. 2019, 36(1): 1-19. doi: 10.1515/revce-2017-0077

52. Lin B, Huang Q, Ali M, et al. Continuous catalytic pyrolysis of oily sludge using U-shape reactor for producing saturates-enriched light oil. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 2019, 37(3): 3101-3108. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.143

53. Brown TM, Duan P, Savage PE. Hydrothermal Liquefaction and Gasification of Nannochloropsis sp. Energy & Fuels. 2010, 24(6): 3639-3646. doi: 10.1021/ef100203u

54. Ho TC, Qiao L. Competitive adsorption of nitrogen species in HDS: Kinetic characterization of hydrogenation and hydrogenolysis sites. Journal of Catalysis. 2010, 269(2): 291-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2009.11.012

55. Duan P, Savage PE. Catalytic hydrothermal hydrodenitrogenation of pyridine. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2011, 108-109: 54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.08.007

56. Bi QY, Lin JD, Liu YM, et al. Gold supported on zirconia polymorphs for hydrogen generation from formic acid in base-free aqueous medium. Journal of Power Sources. 2016, 328: 463-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.056

57. Zhang M, Wu Y, Han X, et al. Upgrading pyrolysis oil by catalytic hydrodeoxygenation reaction in supercritical ethanol with different hydrogen sources. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2022, 446: 136952. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.136952

58. Nie R, Tao Y, Nie Y, et al. Recent Advances in Catalytic Transfer Hydrogenation with Formic Acid over Heterogeneous Transition Metal Catalysts. ACS Catalysis. 2021, 11(3): 1071-1095. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c04939

59. Liu C, Kong L, Wang Y, et al. Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of spirulina to bio-oil in the presence of formic acid over palladium-based catalysts. Algal Research. 2018, 33: 156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2018.05.012

60. Li G, Yang H, Zhang H, et al. Encapsulation of nonprecious metal into ordered mesoporous n-doped carbon for efficient quinoline transfer hydrogenation with formic acid. ACS Catalysis. 2018, 8(9): 8396-8405. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b01404

61. Guo Y, Liu X, Duan P, et al. Catalytic Hydrodenitrogenation of Pyridine under Hydrothermal Conditions: A Comprehensive Study. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2020, 9(1): 362-374. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c07389

62. Wang H, Liang C, Prins R. Hydrodenitrogenation of 2-methylpyridine and its intermediates 2-methylpiperidine and tetrahydro-methylpyridine over sulfided NiMo/γ-Al2O3. Journal of Catalysis. 2007, 251(2): 295-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2007.08.005

63. Katritzky AR, Shipkova PA, Allin SM, et al. Aqueous High-Temperature Chemistry. 24. Nitrogen-Containing Heterocycles in Supercritical Water at 460 ℃. Energy & Fuels. 1995, 9(4): 580-589. doi: 10.1021/ef00052a003

64. Luo L, Liu S, Liu C, et al. High Yield of Hydrocarbons from Catalytic Hydrodenitrogenation of Indole under Hydrothermal Conditions. Energy & Fuels. 2017, 31(11): 12594-12602. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b02322

65. Guo Y, Wang S, Yeh T, et al. Catalytic gasification of indole in supercritical water. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2015, 166-167: 202-210. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.11.033

66. Guo Y, He H, Liu X, et al. Ring-opening and hydrodenitrogenation of indole under hydrothermal conditions over Ni, Pt, Ru, and Ni-Ru bimetallic catalysts. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2021, 406: 126853. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126853

67. Nguyen MT, Tayakout-Fayolle M, Chainet F, et al. Use of kinetic modeling for investigating support acidity effects of NiMo sulfide catalysts on quinoline hydrodenitrogenation. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2017, 530: 132-144. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2016.11.015

68. He F, Wang J, Li Y, et al. Quantum Chemistry Calculations on the Mechanism of Isoquinoline Ring-Opening and Denitrogenation in Supercritical Water. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2017, 56(7): 1782-1790. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b00307

69. Tian S, Li X, Wang A, et al. Hydrodenitrogenation of Quinoline and Decahydroquinoline Over a Surface Nickel Phosphosulfide Phase. Catalysis Letters. 2018, 148(6): 1579-1588. doi: 10.1007/s10562-018-2370-z

70. Xie D, Liu X, Lv H, et al. Products, pathways, and kinetics for catalytic hydrodenitrogenation of quinoline in hydrothermal condition. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2022, 182: 105509. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2021.105509

71. Girgis MJ, Gates BC. Reactivities, reaction networks, and kinetics in high-pressure catalytic hydroprocessing. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 1991, 30(9): 2021-2058. doi: 10.1021/ie00057a001

72. Adschiri T, Shibata R, Sato T, et al. Catalytic Hydrodesulfurization of Dibenzothiophene through Partial Oxidation and a Water−Gas Shift Reaction in Supercritical Water. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 1998, 37(7): 2634-2638. doi: 10.1021/ie970751i

73. Massoth FE, Kim SC. Kinetics of the HDN of Quinoline under Vapor-Phase Conditions. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2003, 42(5): 1011-1022. doi: 10.1021/ie020390t

74. Duan P, Savage PE. Catalytic treatment of crude algal bio-oil in supercritical water: optimization studies. Energy & Environmental Science. 2011, 4(4): 1447. doi: 10.1039/c0ee00343c

75. Bowker RH, Ilic B, Carrillo BA, et al. Carbazole hydrodenitrogenation over nickel phosphide and Ni-rich bimetallic phosphide catalysts. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2014, 482: 221-230. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2014.05.026

76. Li X, Bai J, Wang A, et al. Hydrodesulfurization of Dibenzothiophene and its Hydrogenated Intermediates Over Bulk Ni2P. Topics in Catalysis. 2011, 54(5-7): 290-298. doi: 10.1007/s11244-011-9663-4

77. Shen Z, Ke M, Yu P, et al. Catalytic activities of Mo-modified Ni/Al2O3 catalysts for thioetherification of mercaptans and di-olefins in fluid catalytic cracking naphtha. Transition Metal Chemistry. 2012, 37(6): 587-593. doi: 10.1007/s11243-012-9625-0

78. Kordouli E, Pawelec B, Kordulis C, et al. Hydrodeoxygenation of phenol on bifunctional Ni-based catalysts: Effects of Mo promotion and support. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2018, 238: 147-160. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.07.012

79. Liu Q, Wang S, Zhao G, et al. CO2 methanation over ordered mesoporous NiRu-doped CaO-Al2O3 nanocomposites with enhanced catalytic performance. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2018, 43(1): 239-250. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.11.052

80. Duan P, Savage PE. Hydrothermal Liquefaction of a Microalga with Heterogeneous Catalysts. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2010, 50(1): 52-61. doi: 10.1021/ie100758s

81. Li H, Hu J, Zhang Z, et al. Insight into the effect of hydrogenation on efficiency of hydrothermal liquefaction and physico-chemical properties of biocrude oil. Bioresource Technology. 2014, 163: 143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.015

82. Rinaldi N, Usman, Al-Dalama K, et al. Preparation of Co–Mo/B2O3/Al2O3 catalysts for hydrodesulfurization: Effect of citric acid addition. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2009, 360(2): 130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2009.03.006

83. Gong S, Shinozaki A, Qian EW. Role of Support in Hydrotreatment of Jatropha Oil over Sulfided NiMo Catalysts. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2012, 51(43): 13953-13960. doi: 10.1021/ie301204u

84. Han Y, Gholizadeh M, Tran CC, et al. Hydrotreatment of pyrolysis bio-oil: A review. Fuel Processing Technology. 2019, 195: 106140. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106140

85. Snåre M, Kubičková I, Mäki-Arvela P, et al. Catalytic deoxygenation of unsaturated renewable feedstocks for production of diesel fuel hydrocarbons. Fuel. 2008, 87(6): 933-945. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.06.006

86. Duan P, Savage PE. Catalytic treatment of crude algal bio-oil in supercritical water: Optimization studies. Energy & Environmental Science. 2011, 4: 1447-1456. doi: 10.1039/C0EE00343C

87. Eijsbouts S. The effect of phosphate on the hydrodenitrogenation activity and selectivity of alumina-supported sulfided Mo, Ni, and Ni-Mo catalysts. Journal of Catalysis. 1991, 131(2): 412-432. doi: 10.1016/0021-9517(91)90276-a

88. Rayo P, Ramírez J, Torres-Mancera P, et al. Hydrodesulfurization and hydrocracking of Maya crude with P-modified NiMo/Al2O3 catalysts. Fuel. 2012, 100: 34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.12.004

89. Furimsky E, Massoth FE. Hydrodenitrogenation of Petroleum. Catalysis Reviews. 2005, 47(3): 297-489. doi: 10.1081/cr-200057492

90. Lee YK, Oyama ST. Sulfur resistant nature of Ni2P catalyst in deep hydrodesulfurization. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2017, 548: 103-113. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2017.06.035

91. Peroni M, Lee I, Huang X, et al. Deoxygenation of Palmitic Acid on Unsupported Transition-Metal Phosphides. ACS Catalysis. 2017, 7(9): 6331-6341. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b01294

92. Carenco S, Leyva-Pérez A, Concepción P, et al. Nickel phosphide nanocatalysts for the chemoselective hydrogenation of alkynes. Nano Today. 2012, 7(1): 21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2011.12.003

93. Popczun EJ, McKone JR, Read CG, et al. Nanostructured Nickel Phosphide as an Electrocatalyst for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2013, 135(25): 9267-9270. doi: 10.1021/ja403440e

94. Maity S, Flores G, Ancheyta J, et al. Effect of preparation methods and content of phosphorus on hydrotreating activity. Catalysis Today. 2008, 130(2-4): 374-381. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.10.100

95. Zhao Y. Mechanisms of the hydrodenitrogenation of alkylamines with secondary and tertiary α-carbon atoms on sulfided NiMo/Al2O3. Journal of Catalysis. 2004, 222(2): 532-544. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2003.12.013

96. Gutiérrez OY, Hrabar A, Hein J, et al. Ring opening of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline and decahydroquinoline on MoS2/γ-Al2O3 and Ni–MoS2/γ-Al2O3. Journal of Catalysis. 2012, 295: 155-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2012.08.003

97. Li Z, Savage PE. Feedstocks for fuels and chemicals from algae: Treatment of crude bio-oil over HZSM-5. Algal Research. 2013, 2(2): 154-163. doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2013.01.003

98. Ormsby R, Kastner JR, Miller J. Hemicellulose hydrolysis using solid acid catalysts generated from biochar. Catalysis Today. 2012, 190(1): 89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.02.050

99. Wang B, He Z, Zhang B, et al. Study on hydrothermal liquefaction of spirulina platensis using biochar based catalysts to produce bio-oil. Energy. 2021, 230: 120733. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120733

100. Kambo HS, Dutta A. A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015, 45: 359-378. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.050

101. Azizi N, Ali SA, Alhooshani K, et al. Hydrotreating of light cycle oil over NiMo and CoMo catalysts with different supports. Fuel Processing Technology. 2013, 109: 172-178. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.11.001

水热技术的类型、反应温度和产物。

##submission.downloads##

已出版

2024-02-29

文章引用

张洁, 张玲玲, 李虎林, 田欣悦, 黄荣普, & 卢金玲. (2024). 含油污泥的催化水热转化研究. 清洁能源科学与技术, 2(1), 149. https://doi.org/10.18686/cncest.v2i1.149

栏目

综述文章